Monday, April 9, 2018

Regaining The Lost Confidentiality of Off-Shore Trusts

September 21, 2009
Regaining The Lost Confidentiality of Off-Shore Trusts


By: Lance Wallach

Trusts have been with us forever. In fact, the first trusts date back from England
during the time of the Crusades.

Off-shore Trusts are as the name implies, a trust established in a country other than where you are domiciled. They are established for many reasons, including
investment confidentiality and asset protection. However, whatever the reasons,
without confidentiality their value is negligible.

In establishing an off-shore trust, the client's attorney prepares a trust document,
generally tailored to a specific off-shore jurisdiction. Next, a trust company is hired to administer the trust. The trust company then opens up a custodial account at a bank
who is then notified that the owner of the account is the trust.

Indeed, that was how it used to work. Today, in jurisdiction after jurisdiction, the custodial bank is required to know who the beneficial owner of the trust is. That's right! Banks are no longer satisfied with the name of the trust but need a written statement from the trustee as to who is behind the trust and who in fact is the beneficial owner.

Why is this happening? It is a combination of pressure from the United States, the
European Union and the general war on terrorism.

Some people think they can string one off-shore corporation owning another and
owning another and so on, thinking they have achieved confidentiality. Actually, they
have achieved nothing of the kind. At the end of the line of corporations, the bank
must know who is the ultimate beneficial owner.

Having the bank know who the beneficial owner is opens up a whole new avenue of
attack for creditors. If they can follow funds to the bank and get a court order to find out who the beneficial owner is, all of one's asset protection strategies may well be for naught. Americans are especially vulnerable as the Federal Courts have shown an increasing hostility to off-shore trusts when used as asset protection devices.

The Swiss Annuity Solution

Trust settlers and trust companies along with their advisors are turning increasingly
to Swiss private placement annuities as a solution to the issue of just who is the
beneficial owner of assets. But how can a Swiss annuity solve the problem of
disclosing beneficial ownership?

The answer is simple: The Swiss annuity becomes the beneficial owner of the assets.
The annuity policy then gives the policy owner the right of significant control without
ownership. Here is how it works:


* An application is submitted to the Swiss insurer (or
its Liechtenstein subsidiary).

* The insurer conducts its due diligence on the
applicant.

* The applicant is accepted

* The client transfers the assets into the annuity.

* The funds, while an asset of the insurer, are placed
in a separate account and held by a custodian bank.

* The client requests the insurer to appoint an investment
manager to manage the funds.

Who is the beneficial owner of these assets? The answer again is simple: the
insurance company, because there has been a separation of ownership and control.
By transferring the assets to the insurer, the client is paying a premium. In exchange
for the premium the insurer gives the client an annuity policy, which in turn gives the client certain rights of control to the assets held by the insurer. For example, the client can make withdrawals at any time he chooses.

To be qualified for IRS purposes, there are certain specific rules that must be
followed. The client cannot directly manage the assets. They must be managed by an
investment manager. The most that the client can do is meet with the investment
manager and establish the basic strategy for the portfolio. In addition, there are
diversification rules that must be followed. While almost any asset can be placed
inside a Swiss private placement annuity, there are however certain limitations. For example, one cannot place within the annuity, a business where one works or the
home in which one lives.

On account of the Swiss insurers not being licensed in the U.S., clients need travel
outside of the country to sign the application. Of course, it is perfectly legal for
Americans to purchase annuities or insurance anywhere in the world.

Swiss Annuities and Asset Protection

Swiss annuities contain, as a matter of Swiss law, significant asset protection
features. After the policy has been in force for one year, it is virtually impossible for a creditor to prove fraudulent conveyance, because to do so, the creditor would need to prove fraudulent intent on the part of both the policy owner and the primary beneficiary.

If a policy owner is adjudged bankrupt, under Swiss law he or she looses all control
over the policy. These rights devolve to the primary beneficiary. The only condition is that the primary beneficiary must be either the spouse, child(ren) or grandchild(ren) of the policy owner. As soon as the insurer has knowledge that the policy owner is bankrupt, they are prohibited under Swiss law from accepting any instructions from
him. Once released from bankruptcy, the policy owner's full rights under the policy are restored.

In addition, it is important to note that with regard to lawsuits, Switzerland is a looser pays jurisdiction. If someone brings a suit against your policy, not only will the insurer be responsible for its legal defense, but the loosing party must pay the winner's legal fees.

In this article I have given only a broad brush treatment to Swiss private placement
annuities.
______________________________________________________________________
Lance Wallach, the National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year, speaks and
writes extensively about retirement plans, Circular 230 problems and tax reduction
strategies. He speaks at more than 40 conventions annually, writes for over 50
publications and has written numerous best-selling AICPA books, including Avoiding
Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Business Hot Spots. Contact him
at 516.938.5007 or visit www.vebaplan.com.

The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any
other type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an
appropriate professional for any such advice.

3 comments:

  1. TaxAudit419.com Lawyer4audits.com VebaPlan.org Taxlibrary.us

    ReplyDelete
  2. Think Swiss Annuities Are Safe?
    Think again!
    It's a true story of theft, deception,
    fraud, and conspiracy

    http://NewsPings.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lawyers, Law Firms, Legal InformationFind a Lawyer

    List Your Firm
    Legal Jobs
    FOLLOW US
    Google+
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Home
    Law Firms
    Legal Services
    Law
    Employment
    Students
    Associations
    Articles
    Publications
    Events
    Sign In
    Contact
    Find Legal Articles
    Submit

    Expert Witnesses Recent articlesSubmit an articleBackLegal Articles RSS Feed Print
    Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn


    Section 79 Scams and Captive Insurance History
    By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC

    Firm's Profile & ArticlesFirm's Profile & Articles

    Find a Law Firm:
    ► Need a Lawyer? Let Us Help You

    When trying to understand how a product becomes a target of government scrutiny it helps to know its history. In the case of plans that fall under Internal Revenue Code Section 79, that history is complex.

    Insurance companies, agents, financial planners, and others have pushed abusive 419 and 412i plans for
    years. They claimed business owners could obtain large tax deductions. Insurance companies, agents and others earned very large life insurance commissions in the process. Eventually, the IRS cracked down on the unsuspecting business owners. Not only did they lose the tax deductions, but they were also fined, in addition to being charged penalties and interest. A skilled CPA with extensive IRS experience could usually eliminate the penalties and reduce the fines. Most accountants, tax attorneys and others have been u

    ReplyDelete